JOURNAL ARTICLES
  1. Pannico, R., & Lobo, M. C. (2024). Voting under EMU: economic perceptions, responsibility attribution and EU politicisation. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), 501-527.
  2. Tomic, D., Galais, C., Hernández, E., Marinova, D., Pannico, R., Rico, G., Ares, M., Hierro M.J., Muñoz, J., & Anduiza, E. (2024). The POLAT Panel: Spanish Political Attitudes Survey. Revista española de ciencia política, (65), 73-88.
  3. Pannico, R., & Anduiza, E. (2023). On time and meaningful partisanship: Stability, strength, and sway of attachment to new parties. Party Politics, 29(4), 699-710.
  4. Falcó-Gimeno, A., Muñoz, J., & Pannico, R. (2023). Double-Edged Bullets: The Conditional Effect of Terrorism on Vote for the Incumbent. British Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 183-203. 
  5. Lobo, M.C., & Pannico, R. (2021). Do perceptions of EMU alter clarity of responsibility? A comparison of German and Greek electorates. Electoral Studies, 70, 102287 
  6. Hernández, E., & Pannico, R. (2020). The impact of EU institutional advertising on public support for European integration. European Union Politics, 21(4), 569-589.
  7. Lobo, M.C., & Pannico, R. (2020). Increased Economic Salience or Blurring of Responsibility? Economic Voting during the Great Recession. Electoral Studies, 65, 102141. 
  8. Pannico, R. (2020). Parties are always right: the effects of party cues and policy information on attitudes towards EU issues. West European Politics, 43(4), 869-893. 
  9. Pannico, R. (2017). Is the European Union too complicated? Citizens’ lack of information and party cue effectiveness. European Union Politics ,18(3), 424-446. 

BOOK CHAPTERS
  1. Pannico, R., & Lobo, M.C. (2023). Experimental Evidence of EU Issue Voting. In: Lobo, M.C. (ed) The Impact of EU Politicisation on Voting Behaviour in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Heyne, L., Lobo, M.C., & Pannico, R. (2023). The Left–Right Dimension, Europe and Voting in Bailout Europe. In: Lobo, M.C. (ed) The Impact of EU Politicisation on Voting Behaviour in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Anduiza, E., & Pannico, R. (2020). Attitudinal consequences of partisanship for new parties. In: Oscarsson, H., & Holmberg, S. (eds)  Research Handbook of Political Partisanship. Edward Elgar.

DATASETS
  1. Pannico, R., Tomic, D., Gutiérrez, L., Comellas J.M., Hernández, E., Galais, C., Rico, G., Danislava, M., Muñoz, J., Hierro, M.J., Barbet, B., & Anduiza E. (2024). POLAT Panel. Spanish Political Attitudes Dataset (12 waves). CORA.Repositori de Dades de Recerca.
  2. Heyne, L., Pannico, R., & Lobo, M. C. (2024). TINA survey dataset: citizens perceptions of programmatic choice in Germany and Portugal. Harvard Dataverse. 
  3. Lobo, M. C., Pannico, R., Heyne, L., Silva, T., Kartalis, Y., Nina, S. R., & Santos, N. (2023). MAPLE II Study–Set of pre-and post-legislative elections panel surveys on European Attitudes and Political Behaviour, 2019-2021. Harvard Dataverse.
  4. Lobo, M. C., Pannico, R., Heyne, L., Silva, T., Kartalis, Y., & Nina, S. R. (2023). MAPLE I Study–Public Opinion Panel Survey on European Attitudes and Political Behaviour, 2019. Harvard Dataverse.
  5. Hernández, E., Galais, C., Rico, G., Muñoz, J., Hierro, M. J., Pannico, R., Barbet, B., Marinova, D., & Anduiza, E. (2021). POLAT project. Spanish political attitudes panel dataset (waves 1-6). Diposit Digital de Documents UAB.